← Cases

People v. Essig

151 A.D.2d 1017 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1989-06-02 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1017
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v
p. 1018
William Essig, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude from our review of the record that the suppression court correctly found that the pretrial photographic identification procedures used by the police were not impermissibly suggestive (see, Simmons v United States, 390 US 377 , 384-386). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — rape, first degree.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Lawton, JJ.

Cases cited