Gormel v. Prudential Insurance of America — 151 A.D.2d 1048

Majority

p. 1048

Edward A. Gormel, Appellant, v Prudential Insurance Company of America, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss denied, with leave to renew upon the argument of the appeal. Memorandum: An order resettling a prior order is appealable provided, however, that it "contain[s] a change that is a material one so as to be, in effect, a new determination, thereby creating a corresponding new right to appeal” (Matter of Kolasz v Levitt, 63 AD2d 777 , 779; see, Singer v Board of Educ., 97 AD2d 507 ; May v May, 66 AD2d 918 ). PresenLCallahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Davis, JJ.

Cases cited

Kolasz v. Levitt 63 AD2d 777 N.Y. App. Div. 1978-05-11 at 779 p. 1048
May v. May 66 AD2d 918 N.Y. App. Div. 1978-12-07 p. 1048