Majority
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the warrant to search the premises at 1112 Ferry Avenue was overbroad. The warrant specified that 1112 Ferry Avenue was an apartment house and the area to be searched included the rear entrance way and basement. The police, in searching these areas, seized controlled substances. The description in the warrant, along with its supporting affidavit, sufficiently delineates the area of this multiple dwelling to enable the searcher to identify the place authorized to be searched (see, People v Brooks, 54 AD2d 333 , 335; cf, People v Nieves, 36 NY2d 396 , 401; People v Henley, 135 AD2d 1136 , Iv denied 71 NY2d 897 ).
We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. — criminal sale of controlled substance, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Brooks 54 AD2d 333 at 335 p. 989
- People v. Nieves 36 NY2d 396 at 401 p. 989
- People v. Henley 135 AD2d 1136 p. 989
- People v. Miller 57 AD2d 668 p. 990