← Cases

Hartford Insurance v. Hale

154 A.D.2d 909 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1989-10-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 909
Hartford Insurance Company, Appellant, v Roland Hale et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Summary judgment should have been granted to plaintiff against defendant, a town supervisor, even though there was no showing of negligence on his part. It is undisputed that town funds had been converted during defendant’s term of office. A public officer is strictly liable for the loss of public funds received by virtue of his office (Matter of Bird v McGoldrick, 277 NY 492 ; City of New York v Fox, 232 NY 167 , 169; Tillinghast v Merrill, 151 NY 135 , 142; Fidelity & Cas. Co. v Finch, 3 AD2d 141 , 143; Town of Evans v Catalino, 103 Misc 2d 261 , 266, affd 88 AD2d 780 , lv dismissed 58 NY2d 687 ). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Allegany County, Sprague, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cases cited