Hyperlawhypertext legal database Thompson v. Hillery 158 A.D.2d 525

← Cases

Thompson v. Hillery

158 A.D.2d 525 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1990-02-13 English

Contents

Majority

p. 525
In the Matter of Frederick Thompson, Petitioner, v Judith A. Hillery, Respondent.

The extraordinary remedy of a writ of prohibition does not properly lie under the instant circumstances in view of the availability of an adequate remedy at law (see, Matter of Lipari v Owens, 70 NY2d 731 ; Matter of Motea v Marasco, 64 NY2d 718 ). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cases cited