Majority
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, plaintiffs motion denied,
The court erred in granting plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim. Whether to grant an extension to file a notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) is discretionary (see, Cohen v Pearl Riv. Union Free School Dist., 51 NY2d 256 , 259). Courts are to consider in particular whether the responsible party had actual notice, and also shall consider all other relevant facts, including infancy (General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]). Here, plaintiff failed to prove that defendants had actual knowledge of the facts underlying her negligence claim (see, Washington v City of New York, 72 NY2d 881 , 883; Wencek v County of Chautauqua, 132 AD2d 950 ). We find that defendants have demonstrated substantial prejudice (see, Matter of Hogan v Town of Orangetown, 108 AD2d 857 ), and that the disability of infancy is outweighed by other factors (see, Matter of Schirripa v Birch Lane Elementary School, 154 AD2d 536 ; Matter of Groshans v Town of Babylon, 143 AD2d 666 ). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Willis, J.—late notice of claim.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Law-ton, JJ.
Cases cited
- Cohen v. Pearl River Union Free School District 51 NY2d 256 at 259 p. 1034
- Washington v. City of New York 72 NY2d 881 at 883 p. 1034
- Groshans v. Town of Babylon 143 AD2d 666 p. 1034