Majority
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendants City of Buffalo and William Buyers, as Commissioner of the Department of Human Resources, contend on this appeal that Supreme Court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of a complaint denominated "First Action” which asserts a cause of action for slander. We disagree. In our view, Supreme Court properly denied the motion because defendants failed to proffer proof in admissible form demonstrating that the statement attributed to defendant Buyers was, under the facts and circumstances surrounding its publication, absolutely (see, Clark v McGee, 49 NY2d 613 , 617-619) or qualifiedly (see, Toker v Pollak, 44 NY2d 211 , 219) privileged, as a matter of law (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065 , 1067-1068). Further, defendants failed to establish, prima facie, that the statement uttered by Buyers did not, as a matter of law, constitute
Cases cited
- Clark v. McGee 49 NY2d 613 at 617-619 p. 974
- Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc. 46 NY2d 1065 at 1067-1068 p. 974
- Rinaldi v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc. 42 NY2d 369 at 380 p. 975
- Zuckerman v. City of New York 49 NY2d 557 at 563 p. 975