Majority
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the People failed to present sufficient independent evidence to corroborate the testimony of her accomplice. The corroborative evidence need not demonstrate that defendant committed the crime; it need only tend to connect defendant with the crime sufficiently to establish that the accomplice is telling the truth (see, CPL 60.22 [1]; People v Smith, 55 NY2d 945 ; People v Glasper, 52 NY2d 970 ). Proof that silverware and a fraudulent sales receipt were found in the trunk of a car within defendant’s control was sufficient to corroborate the accomplice’s testimony concerning defendant’s involvement in a scheme to steal merchandise from a store (see, People v Pasciuta, 104 AD2d 1010 ).
Cases cited
- People v. Smith 55 NY2d 945 p. 888
- People v. Glasper 52 NY2d 970 p. 888
- People v. James 98 AD2d 863 at 865 p. 889
- People v. Cox 286 NY 137 at 141 p. 889
- People v. Gutterson 244 NY 243 p. 889
- People v. Amereno 31 Misc 2d 806 at 807 p. 889