Majority
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s assertions, we find, based upon this record, that defense counsel provided meaningful representation (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796 , 799). The verdict is neither repugnant nor inconsistent. The proof against defendant and the codefendant differed in both content and degree and the court, sitting as trier of the facts, could have found that the People failed to disprove the codefendant’s alibi defense beyond a reasonable doubt but sufficiently rebutted the alibi evidence submitted on defendant’s behalf. Consequently, defendant’s conviction as charged is not
Cases cited
- People v. Satterfield 66 NY2d 796 at 799 p. 909
- People v. Green 71 NY2d 1006 at 1008 p. 910
- People v. Hampton 61 NY2d 963 at 964 p. 910