Majority
Judgment unanimously affirmed.
The trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. The record reveals that defendant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently entered his plea of guilty. Defendant was afforded a reasonable opportunity to advance his contentions by the court, which had presided over the suppression hearing and thus had the benefit of eyewitness testimony linking defendant to the attempted burglary (see, People v Kafka, 128 AD2d 895 , lv denied 69 NY2d 951 ), yet defendant failed either to substantiate his belated protestations of innocence or his conclusory assertions that his guilty plea was induced by coercion (see, People v Kafka, supra; People v Morris, 118 AD2d 595 , lv denied 67 NY2d 947 ; People v Colon, 114 AD2d 967 , lv denied 67 NY2d 650 ). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.—attempted burglary, third degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Ferrara 99 AD2d 257 at 259 p. 916
- People v. Grey 135 AD2d 1031 at 1031-1032 p. 916
- People v. Kehn 132 AD2d 778 at 779 p. 916
- People v. Prest 105 AD2d 1078 at 1079 p. 916
- People v. Kafka 128 AD2d 895 p. 916