Majority
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the inventory search of his vehicle was pretextual and unlawful. Upon impounding a vehicle, the police may conduct an inventory search of it and of any containers found therein (see, People v Gonzalez, 62 NY2d 386 , 388-390; see also, People v Townsend, 152 AD2d 515 , appeal dismissed 76 NY2d 746 ; South Dakota v Opperman, 428 US 364 ; cf., People v Lloyd,
Moreover, the record fully supports the determination of the suppression court that the police officers acted lawfully when they stopped and arrested defendant (cf., People v Howell, 49 NY2d 778 ; People v Carvajales, 152 AD2d 675 , lv denied 75 NY2d 768 ; People v Mikel, 152 AD2d 603 ).
We have examined the other contentions raised by defendant and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 1st Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Gonzalez 62 NY2d 386 at 388-390 p. 1025
- People v. Townsend 152 AD2d 515 p. 1025
- South Dakota v. Opperman 428 US 364 p. 1025
- People v. Lloyd 167 AD2d 856 p. 1026
- Florida v. Wells 495 US 1 at 109 p. 1026
- Colorado v. Bertine 479 US 367 at 374 p. 1026
- Illinois v. Lafayette 462 US 640 at 643-644, 648 p. 1026
- People v. Howell 49 NY2d 778 p. 1026
- People v. Mikel 152 AD2d 603 p. 1026