← Cases

People v. Shannon

175 A.D.2d 614 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1991-07-12 English

Contents

Majority

p. 614
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darnell Shannon, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s argument that the sentencing court erred in failing to honor its sentence agreement. Where, as here, the court expressly makes a commitment to impose a particular sentence subject to certain conditions, and defendant violates one of those

p. 615
conditions, the court is no longer bound by the agreement and may impose a greater sentence without giving defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea (see, People v Brooks, 154 AD2d 931 ; see also, People v Murello, 39 NY2d 879 ; People v Dodson, 114 AD2d 421 ; People v McDaniels, 111 AD2d 876 ). In any event, defendant did not move to withdraw his guilty plea and thus did not preserve this issue for appellate review (see, People v Brooks, supra; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 ).

We have examined defendant’s other contention and find it likewise to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Doyle, J. — Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.

Cases cited