Majority
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: From our review of the record, we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that the value of the fruits of the offense exceeded $30,000 and therefore the court’s order of restitution in that amount was proper (see, Penal Law § 60.27; see, e.g., People v Reiter, 133 AD2d 901 , 902-903, lv denied 71 NY2d 901 ). Further, we find no merit to defendant’s pro se contention that his sentence was harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. — Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present — Callahan, A. P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Reiter 133 AD2d 901 at 902-903 p. 1234