Majority
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant, conceding that there is no statutory basis for disqualification under Judiciary Law § 14, contends that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to decline to recuse itself because an alleged victim held the position of Chief Clerk of the Supreme and County Courts for the County of Niagara. We disagree. It is well established that, absent a legal disqualification under Judiciary Law § 14, a Trial Judge is the " 'sole arbiter’ ” of recusal (People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403 , 406; see also, Burdick v Shearson Am. Express, 160 AD2d 642 , 643; People v Webb, 159 AD2d 289 ). Here, the record contains no suggestion that the Trial Judge’s impartiality
Cases cited
- People v. Moreno 70 NY2d 403 at 406 p. 1056
- Burdick v. Shearson American Express, Inc. 160 AD2d 642 at 643 p. 1056
- People v. Webb 159 AD2d 289 p. 1056
- People v. Groves 157 AD2d 970 at 972 p. 1057
- Leombruno v. Leombruno 150 AD2d 902 p. 1057