People v. Beltre

Defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied. The officers were responding to one of a number of reports of an assault in progress, and a person whose description matched that of the defendant possessed the gun that was mentioned in the reports. When encountered by the police, defendant was wearing a shirt like the one described in the reports and carrying a small ax. Under these circumstances, the patdown that the officers conducted was permissible to insure their safety. (People v McLaurin, 43 NY2d 902 , revg on dissenting opn 56 AD2d 80 ; People v Sustr, 73 AD2d 582 .)

Defendant was not deprived of a fair hearing because of the failure of the police to preserve the ax, which disappeared in the melee, the loss of this evidence being a matter that was necessarily considered by the hearing court in assessing the credibility of the police officer who testified. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.