Majority
Defendant, testifying in his own behalf, admitted breaking into the car, but asserted that he had found the credit cards on top of a garbage can in the vicinity.
The People’s evidence rebutting defendant’s testimony on cross-examination that he did not ask for money in exchange for the credit cards was of collateral importance (cf., People v Harris, 57 NY2d 335 , 345, cert denied 460 US 1047 ), but did not depart substantially from defendant’s own testimony, and we discern no significant prejudice as a result of its admission (compare, People v McCann, 90 AD2d 554 ). While it was improper for the trial prosecutor to call defendant a liar and to suggest that he tailored his testimony (People v Martin, 172 AD2d 268 ; People v World, 157 AD2d 567 ) in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, these errors, even viewed cumulatively, do not warrant reversal. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Harris 57 NY2d 335 at 345 p. 359
- Smith v. Mississippi 460 US 1047 p. 359
- People v. Martin 172 AD2d 268 p. 359