← Cases

Manhattan Vermeer Co. v. Guterman

179 A.D.2d 561 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1992-01-28 English

Contents

Majority

p. 561
Manhattan Vermeer Company, Respondent, v Gerald Guterman et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

It is within the IAS court’s discretion to determine whether or not a party who claims not to have been properly served has shown a reasonable excuse for the default (see, Orimex Trading v Berman, 168 AD2d 263 ). Here, the record supports the IAS court’s conclusion that the appealing defendants did not show a reasonable excuse for their default, and indeed that the default was deliberate. Accordingly, the motion to

p. 562
vacate the default was properly denied. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Ross and Kassal, JJ.

Cases cited