Majority
Claiming that he only pleaded guilty out of fear of an unfair trial and his possible adjudication as a persistent felony offender, defendant moved to withdraw his plea. Defendant also claimed that he was innocent of the charge. As we find no substantiated claims of fraud, mistake or innocence, County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion (see, People v Cance, 155 AD2d 764 , 765; People v Gibson, 84 AD2d 885 , 886). First, his contention that he could not receive a fair trial was based entirely on his own subjective belief and nothing in the record supports this claim. In addition, defendant’s reliance on the accurate information from his attorney that he could be sentenced as a persistent felony offender does not turn an otherwise voluntary plea into one based on coercion, especially when defendant stated that
Weiss, Acting P. J., Levine, Mercure and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Cases cited
- People v. Cance 155 AD2d 764 at 765 p. 937
- People v. Gibson 84 AD2d 885 at 886 p. 937
- People v. Howard 138 AD2d 525 p. 938
- People v. Morris 107 AD2d 973 at 974 p. 938
- People v. Lattmen 101 AD2d 662 at 663 p. 938