← Cases

Sosa v. Mulroy

182 A.D.2d 1139 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1992-04-24 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1139
In the Matter of Victor S. Sosa, Petitioner, v J. Kevin Mulroy, as Judge of the Onondaga County Court, et al., Respondents.

Petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Prohibition does not lie, where, as here, "there is available an adequate remedy by way of appeal or otherwise” (Matter of Molea v Marasco, 64 NY2d 718 , 720; see also, Matter of Dondi v Jones, 40 NY2d 8 , 14, rearg denied 39 NY2d 1058 ; Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d 59 , 62; Matter of Price v Rath, 177 AD2d 1057 ). The extraordinary remedy of prohibition lies only where petitioner has established a clear or legal right to relief and where the action taken or threatened is clearly without jurisdiction or in excess of jurisdiction (Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348 , 352). (Original Proceeding Pursuant to Article 78.) Present — Den-man, P. J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Cases cited