Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered April 2, 1990, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant is alleged to have provided a handful of vials filled with crack cocaine to a codefendant who, in turn, handed the vials to another codefendant, who subsequently gave two of the vials to an undercover police officer in exchange for $10 in prerecorded money.
Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt (see, People v Cobbs, 161 AD2d 723 ; People v Policano, 139 AD2d 773 , 774). Furthermore, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier-of-fact, who saw and heard the witnesses
Cases cited
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 690
- People v. Cobbs 161 AD2d 723 p. 690
- People v. Policano 139 AD2d 773 at 774 p. 690
- People v. Garafolo 44 AD2d 86 at 88 p. 691