Majority
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Swartwood, J.), entered December 7, 1990 in Chemung County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
Petitioner commenced this habeas corpus proceeding arguing that his confession should have been suppressed as the product of a warrantless arrest. Because a writ of habeas corpus is not generally available to raise issues which were or could have been raised on direct appeal or by way of a CPL article 440 motion (see, People ex rel. Woodard v Berry, 143 AD2d 457 , 458, lv denied 73 NY2d 705 ; People ex rel. Rosado v Miles, 138 AD2d 808 ), Supreme Court properly denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus. In addition, we see no reason to depart from traditional orderly procedure (see, People ex rel. Grady v LeFevre, 152 AD2d 850 , lv denied
Weiss, P. J., Crew III, Mahoney, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Cases cited
- People ex rel. Woodard v. Berry 143 AD2d 457 at 458 p. 872
- People ex rel. Rosado v. Miles 138 AD2d 808 p. 872
- People ex rel. Grady v. LeFevre 152 AD2d 850 p. 872