Majority
Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Although there was substantial evidence to support a determination of misconduct, we find that the 30-day suspension imposed by respondent was improper. The county’s rules of conduct provide that an oral warning is an appropriate sanction for a first offense of "[ejngaging in conduct which may result in a safety hazard”. Regardless of whether we accept respondent’s assertion that the rules were merely intended as guidelines, we conclude that the sanction is so disproportionate as to shock
Majority
Present — Denman, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Fallon, JJ.
Cases cited
- Pell v. Board of Education 34 NY2d 222 at 233-234 p. 613