← Cases

People v. Pullano

185 A.D.2d 628 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1992-07-14 English

Contents

Majority

p. 628
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dominic Pullano, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his claim that the Grand Jury proceedings were defective because evidence obtained pursuant to an unlawful wiretap (see, People v Chiarenza, 185 AD2d 679 [decided herewith]; Peo

p. 629
ple v Candella, 171 AD2d 329 ) was presented to the Grand Jury (see, People v Kazmarick, 52 NY2d 322 , 326).

We decline defendant’s request that we modify, in the interest of justice, the one-year imprisonment term imposed by the sentencing court. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Conspiracy, 3rd Degree.) Present —Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Cases cited