← Cases

People v. Bernard

185 A.D.2d 660 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1992-07-14 English

Contents

Majority

p. 660
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Bernard, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant, by pleading guilty, forfeited his

p. 661
right to challenge whether hearsay or bolstering testimony should have been admitted before the Grand Jury (see, People v Campbell, 73 NY2d 481 , 486; People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1 , 5). Additionally, this court lacks interest-of-justice jurisdiction to review the minimum indeterminate sentence mandated by statute for second felony offenders (People v Clark, 176 AD2d 1206 , Iv denied 79 NY2d 854 ). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.—Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Doerr, JJ.

Cases cited