← Cases

People v. Szeliga

186 A.D.2d 1042 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1992-10-07 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1042
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Szeliga, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court correctly concluded that the questioning of defendant by Investigator Clark was noncustodial and that defendant’s statement was voluntary (see, People v Centano, 76 NY2d 837 , 838). Thus, defendant’s statement was properly admitted at trial. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. — Leaving Scene of Accident.) Present — -Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Boehm and Doerr, JJ.

Cases cited