← Cases

People v. Rogler

186 A.D.2d 1076 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1992-10-07 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1076
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rudolf "Rudy" Rogler, Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record and consideration of the relevant factors (see, People v Cruickshank, 105 AD2d 325 , 333-334, affd sub nom. People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625 ), we find no abuse of discretion in the court’s denial of defendant’s application for youthful offender status (see, People v New, 171 AD2d 1006 , lv denied 77 NY2d 998 ; People v Ortega, 114 AD2d 912 , lv denied 67 NY2d 887 ). Further, we decline to exercise our discretion in the interest of justice to grant him that status (cf., People v Shrubsall, 167 AD2d 929 , 930). Finally, the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Criminally Negligent Homicide.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Balio, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Cases cited