Majority
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, plea vacated, motion granted in part and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: By entering a plea of guilty, defendant waived his right to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence before the Grand Jury (see, People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97 , 108; People v Kazmarick, 52 NY2d 322 , 326; People v Del Carpio, 166 AD2d 605 , lv denied 76 NY2d 1020 ). We reject defendant’s argument, based upon People v Dunn ( 59 AD2d 647 ), that the indictment was jurisdictionally defective. Unlike in Dunn (supra), County Court did not lack jurisdiction to issue the eavesdropping warrant.
The People assert that defendant entered a plea in August 1990, before the suppression hearing was held, thereby waiv
Cases cited
- People v. Pelchat 62 NY2d 97 at 108 p. 934
- People v. Kazmarick 52 NY2d 322 at 326 p. 934
- People v. Del Carpio 166 AD2d 605 p. 934
- People v. Candella 171 AD2d 329 p. 935
- People v. Edelstein 54 NY2d 306 p. 935
- People v. Gallina 95 AD2d 336 p. 935