Hyperlawhypertext legal database Graham v. City of Rochester 188 A.D.2d 1088

← Cases

Graham v. City of Rochester

188 A.D.2d 1088 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1992-12-30 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1088
Jerry Graham, Appellant-Respondent, v City of Roch
p. 1089
ester, Respondent, and Monroe County, Respondent-Appellant. City of Rochester, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, and Monroe County, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, v Rochester Gas & Electric, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Motion for clarification denied. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s motion to clarify the order is denied as unnecessary. Plaintiff is entitled by law to interest from the date of the verdict (see, CPLR 5002.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.