Bridgemarket Associates v. City of New York — 190 A.D.2d 561

Majority

p. 561

Bridgemarket Associates, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.), entered October 9, 1991, which denied defendants’ motion for a stay of this action pending exhaustion of appellate remedies in Sutton Area Community v City of New York ( 190 AD2d 562 [decided herewith]), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

These two actions, while arising from the same set of

p. 562

transactions, do not have complete identity of parties and causes of action, and thus a stay under CPLR 2201 is not warranted (Hope’s Windows v Albro Metal Prods. Corp., 93 AD2d 711 , 712, appeal dismissed 59 NY2d 968 ). Concur— Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.

Cases cited

Sutton Area Community, Inc. v. City of New York 190 AD2d 562 N.Y. App. Div. 1993-02-09 p. 561
Hope's Windows v. Albro Metal Products Corp. 93 AD2d 711 N.Y. App. Div. 1983-04-05 at 712 p. 562