Majority
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered April 30, 1992 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination denying petitioner’s grievance.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding claiming that the denial of his right to possess Tarot cards in prison infringes on the exercise of his religious belief and, therefore, violates his rights under the 1st Amendment. In his brief on appeal, however, petitioner does not advance a religious intent with respect to possessing the Tarot cards, but simply claims that he should be allowed to keep the Tarot cards for his own "edification, recreation and deep personal
Mikoll, J. P., Levine, Mahoney, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Cases cited
- Blades v. Twomey 159 AD2d 868 at 869 p. 982