Majority
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: A custody determination depends to a great extent upon the trial court’s assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and upon the assessments of the character and temperament of the parties (Skolnick v Skolnick, 142 AD2d 570 ). As such, the factual findings of the trial court in a custody matter are accorded great deference (Matter of Kennedy v Kennedy, 156 AD2d 834 , 835; Skolnick v Skolnick, supra). A custody determination should not be disturbed unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record or is contrary to the weight of the credible evidence (see, Matter of Gill v Gill, 135 AD2d 1090 , 1090-1091; Freiman v Freiman, 99 AD2d 765 ). Upon our review of the record, we find no reason to disturb Family Court’s determination, made following a full hearing, that respondent should be awarded sole custody of the son of the parties, with visitation to petitioner. (Appeal from Order of
Cases cited
- Skolnick v. Skolnick 142 AD2d 570 p. 1013
- Kennedy v. Kennedy 156 AD2d 834 at 835 p. 1013
- Freiman v. Freiman 99 AD2d 765 p. 1013