Majority
p. 1062Gorman, Naim and Musa, M.D., P. C., et al., Appellants, v ABJ Fire Protection, Inc., Respondent and Third-
p. 1063Party Plaintiff-Respondent. A. Zaborny Co., Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents; Diagnostic Therapeutic Associates, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Norstar Bank of Upstate New York et al., Plaintiffs, v Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation et al., Respondents, and Diagnostic Therapeutic Associates, Appellant. A. Zaborny Co., Inc., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v Gorman, Naim and Musa, M.D., P. C., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants. (Action No. 2.) (Appeal No. 1.) [601 NYS2d 883]
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court’s order directing a deposition of plaintiffs’-third-party defendants’ expert limited to his factual observations was not an abuse of discretion under the special circumstances existing here (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [iii]; Rosario v General Motors Corp., 148 AD2d 108 ; Morrison v Ellis, 91 AD2d 1172 ; see also, Krygier v Airweld, Inc., 176 AD2d 700 ). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J.— Protective Order.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Boomer, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Cases cited
- Rosario v. General Motors Corp. 148 AD2d 108 p. 1063
- Krygier v. Airweld, Inc. 176 AD2d 700 p. 1063