Majority
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. Sheridan, J.), rendered May 13, 1992, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2Vi to 5 years, affirmed.
Defendant’s motion to suppress the cocaine was properly denied since his discarding of it during the chase was not precipitated by illegal police conduct (People v Leung, 68 NY2d 734 , 736). The stop of the cab in which defendant was a passenger was justified by the officers’ observation that the cab’s brake lights were not functioning (People v Ingle, 36 NY2d 413 ), and pursuit of the defendant justified by his precipitate flight, hand motion grabbing at his waistband, and glances over his shoulder, all of which gave rise to a reason
Dissent
dissents in a memorandum as follows: I would reverse based on People v Grant ( 164 AD2d 170 , appeal dismissed 77 NY2d 926 ). The flight of the defendant, in and of itself, could not create a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity (People v Martinez, 80 NY2d 444 , 448, citing People v May, 81 NY2d 725 ). Here there were no facts beyond defendant passenger’s flight upon the officers’ approach to the cab on which to base a finding of reasonable suspicion of criminal activity on the part of defendant.
Cases cited
- People v. Leung 68 NY2d 734 at 736 p. 699
- People v. Ingle 36 NY2d 413 p. 699
- People v. Martinez 80 NY2d 444 at 448 p. 700
- People v. Matienzo 81 NY2d 778 p. 700
- People v. Grant 164 AD2d 170 p. 700
- People v. May 81 NY2d 725 p. 700