Majority
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in its response to the jury’s request for supplemental instructions on the "criteria” for the crimes charged. The court responded meaningfully to the inquiry by providing the elements of the crimes under consideration without repeating its instructions on the justification defense (see, People v Almodovar, 62 NY2d 126 , 131-132; see also, People v Malloy, 55 NY2d 296 , 302, cert denied 459 US 847 ).
We find no error in County Court’s denial of the motion to suppress defendant’s statement to the police. The court’s findings of fact are entitled to great weight, unless clearly erroneous (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759 , 761; People v Smith, 193 AD2d 1054 ; People v Pitsley, 185 AD2d 645 , lv denied 81 NY2d 792 ; People v Williams, 174 AD2d 969 , lv denied 78 NY2d 1015 ).
Defendant’s sentence is not harsh and excessive.
We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find that none requires reversal. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J.—Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Almodovar 62 NY2d 126 at 131-132 p. 868
- People v. Malloy 55 NY2d 296 at 302 p. 868
- People v. Smith 193 AD2d 1054 p. 868
- People v. Pitsley 185 AD2d 645 p. 868
- People v. Williams 174 AD2d 969 p. 868
- People v. Malizia 62 NY2d 755 at 757 p. 869
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 869
- People v. Bleakley 69 NY2d 490 at 495 p. 869