Majority
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motions denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint. Although plaintiffs will bear the burden at trial of proving that defendants had constructive notice of the icy condition in the parking lot (see, Anderson v Klein’s Foods, 139 AD2d 904 , affd 73 NY2d 835 , rearg denied 73 NY2d 918 ; Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836 , 837), on this motion for summary judgment, defendants bore the burden of showing entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 , 325). "Failure to make such showing requires denial of the motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers” (Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 , 853). We conclude that defendants did not carry their burden of proving lack of constructive notice (cf., Walton v Wegmans Food Mkts., 191
Cases cited
- Anderson v. Klein's Foods, Inc. 73 NY2d 835 p. 889
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History 67 NY2d 836 at 837 p. 889
- Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital 68 NY2d 320 at 325 p. 889
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center 64 NY2d 851 at 853 p. 889