← Cases

People v. Van Schoick

198 A.D.2d 907 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1993-11-19 English

Contents

Majority

p. 907
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald Van Schoick, Appellant.
[604 NYS2d 455]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 , 665). In any event, his argument is without merit. Defendant committed forgery in the second degree by signing a fingerprint card with a false name. It is irrelevant whether the card was blank when signed (see, People v Moore, 171 AD2d 1051 , lv denied 77 NY2d 998 ; People v Hennessy, 133 AD2d 174 ; People v Kirk, 115 AD2d 758 , affd 68 NY2d 722 ). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Forgery, 2nd

p. 908
Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Boomer and. Davis, JJ.

Cases cited