Stolz v. Pawlus

2 A.D.2d 869 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1956-10-31 English

Contents

Majority

p. 869

James R. Stolz, Appellant, v. Joseph Pawlus, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except MeCurn, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a new trial. (Appeal from a judgment of Onondaga Trial Term for defendant for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action.) Present ■—• MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Wheeler, Williams and Bastow, JJ.