Hyperlawhypertext legal database Gentile v. Hildman 2 A.D.2d 871

← Cases

Gentile v. Hildman

2 A.D.2d 871 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1956-10-31 English

Contents

Majority

p. 871
George Gentile, Appellant, v. Joseph P. Hildman et al., Individually and Doing Business as Specialty Motor & Brake Service, Respondents.

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence presented questions of fact as to negligence and contributory negligence. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Onondaga Trial Term dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case, in a negligence action.) Present—MeCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Wheeler, Williams and Bastow, JJ.