Hyperlawhypertext legal database In re the Claim of Sperling 20 A.D.2d 584

← Cases

In re the Claim of Sperling

20 A.D.2d 584 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1963-12-19 English

Contents

Majority

p. 584
In the Matter of the Claim of Rose Sperling, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

What constitutes “good cause” within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 593 of the Labor Law is a question of fact and thus within the province of the board if its findings are supported by substantial evidence (Labor Law, § 623; Matter of Lipschitz [Lubin], 7 A D 2d 777 ). On the present record we find no reason to disturb the board’s determination. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present —Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.