Majority
Appeal by the defen
Ordered the judgment is affirmed.
Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the defendant’s plea was both factually sufficient and was entered into knowingly, intelligently, arid voluntarily (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 ). In addition, there is no basis to the defendant’s claim that counsel failed to provide meaningful representation (see, People v Jackson, 70 NY2d 768 ). Accordingly, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s application to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Cance, 155 AD2d 764 ; People v Howard, 138 AD2d 525 ). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Harris 61 NY2d 9 p. 494
- People v. Jackson 70 NY2d 768 p. 494
- People v. Cance 155 AD2d 764 p. 494
- People v. Howard 138 AD2d 525 p. 494