Majority
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30 (3). The newly discovered evidence, consisting of a hearsay statement by a witness that was inconsistent with his trial testimony, did not "create a probability” that the outcome "would have been more favorable” to defendant if it had been admitted at trial (CPL 330.30 [3]; see, People v Cullen, 175 AD2d 658 , lv denied 78 NY2d 1010 ). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting defendant’s cross-examination of the police officer who prepared defendant’s written statement (see, People v Ocasio, 47 NY2d 55 , 60; People v Duffy, 36 NY2d 258 , 262-263; People v James, 191 AD2d 957 , lv denied 82 NY2d 720 , cert denied — US —, 127 L Ed 2d 85 ).
Cases cited
- People v. Cullen 175 AD2d 658 p. 868
- People v. Ocasio 47 NY2d 55 at 60 p. 868
- People v. Duffy 36 NY2d 258 at 262-263 p. 868
- People v. Boettcher 69 NY2d 174 at 180 p. 869
- People v. Price 144 AD2d 1013 p. 869
- People v. Bethea 67 NY2d 364 at 368 p. 869