Majority
—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: We reserved decision and remitted this matter to Onondaga County Court for a reconstruction hearing (see, People v Wiley, 193 AD2d 1062 , lv dismissed 82 NY2d 728 ) in accordance with our decision in People v Mitchell ( 189 AD2d 337 ; see also, People v Michalek, 82 NY2d 906 ). The record of the reconstruction hearing does not support a finding that defendant was present at the Sandoval hearing and, therefore, reversal is required (see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656 , 662; see also, People v Cruz, 81 NY2d 738 ; People v Gebrosky, 80 NY2d 995 ).
Contrary to the People’s contention, defendant’s presence would not have been "superfluous” (People v Odiat, 82 NY2d 872 , 874; see, People v Favor, 82 NY2d 254 ). (Resubmission of
Cases cited
- People v. Mitchell 189 AD2d 337 p. 939
- People v. Michalek 82 NY2d 906 p. 939
- People v. Dokes 79 NY2d 656 at 662 p. 939
- People v. Cruz 81 NY2d 738 p. 939
- People v. Gebrosky 80 NY2d 995 p. 939
- People v. Odiat 82 NY2d 872 at 874 p. 939
- People v. Favor 82 NY2d 254 p. 939