Majority
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
It is well settled that a municipality’s duty to install and maintain street lighting is limited to situations where lighting is required to avoid dangerous and potentially hazardous conditions (see, Thompson v City of New York, 78 NY2d 682 , 684; Cracas v Zisko, 204 AD2d 382 ). Here, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the streetlight outage created such a condition in the parking lot in question (see, Nallan v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 50 NY2d 507 , 518-519; Smith v Fishkill Health-Related Ctr., 184 AD2d 963 , 965). The Supreme Court therefore properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Thompson v. City of New York 78 NY2d 682 at 684 p. 505
- Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc. 50 NY2d 507 at 518-519 p. 505
- Smith v. Fishkill Health-Related Center, Inc. 184 AD2d 963 at 965 p. 505