Majority
—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In Matter of Jose R. ( 83 NY2d 388 ), the Court of Appeals explicitly rejected "wholesale dismissals on a per se basis for speedy disposition lapses, irrespective of the reasons for the time lapse”, holding that, "[e]ven assuming an overarching speedy dispositional phase right does pertain, the Family Court Act does not correspondingly direct dismissal relief for a lapse in that regard” (Matter of Jose R., supra, at 393-394; cf., Matter of Christopher WW., 189 AD2d 411 ; Matter of Faruq F., 186 AD2d 799 ; Matter of Roshon P., 182 AD2d 346 ). Accordingly, the appellant’s contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- In re Jose R. 83 NY2d 388 p. 448
- In re Christopher WW. 189 AD2d 411 p. 448
- In re Roshon P. 182 AD2d 346 p. 448