Majority
p. 990Investors Special Risk Ins. Co., Appellant-Respondent, v John Smith et al., Respondents-Appellants. [617 NYS2d 689]
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs motion and defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment. The proof fails to establish, as a matter of law, whether defendants are liable to pay past-due premiums on the policies issued by plaintiff (cf., Home Indem. Co. v Castel Constr., 128 Misc 2d 1026 ). Further, defendants did not meet their burden of demonstrating that
p. 991
plaintiff lacks capacity to maintain this action because of Business Corporation Law § 1312 (a) (see, Interline Furniture v Hodor Indus. Corp., 140 AD2d 307 ; Alicanto, S. A. v Woolverton, 129 AD2d 601 ; Von Arx, A. G. v Breitenstein, 52 AD2d 1049 , affd 41 NY2d 958 ). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, Jr., J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.
Cases cited
- Home Indemnity Co. v. Castel Construction Inc. 128 Misc 2d 1026 p. 990
- Interline Furniture, Inc. v. Hodor Industries Corp. 140 AD2d 307 p. 991
- Alicanto, S. A. v. Woolverton 129 AD2d 601 p. 991