← Cases

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Nissho Pacific Corp.

21 A.D.2d 966 Court First Department, Decision date 1964-06-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 966
First Department,
June, 1964[1]
(June 4, 1964)
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Nissho Pacific Corporation et al.

Motion granted only to the extent of amending the designation of the parties to this action so that Chase Manhattan Bank is designated plaintiff-appellant-respondent, The Nissho Pacific Corporation is designated defendant-appellant-respondent and lino ELaiun Kaisha, Ltd. is designated defendant-appellant-respondent. In all other respects the motion is denied, without prejudice, however, to defendant-appellant-respondent lino Kaiun Kaisha, Ltd.’s right to include in its appendix “ such additional parts of the record as are necessary to consider the questions involved.” (CPLR 5528, subd. [to].) Concur — Botein, P. J., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Staley, JJ.