Majority
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered. June 23, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identificátion testimony.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The evidence supports the hearing court’s determination that the single-photograph identification of the defendant as the person who sold drugs-to an undercover officer was merely confirmatory in nature. The undercover officer identified the defendant minutes after his first face-to-face transaction with the defendant and had previously seen the defendant in the neighborhood on numerous occasions (see, People v Johnson, 173 AD2d 734 ; People v Kearn, 118 AD2d 871 ; cf., People v Waring, 183 AD2d 271 ). In any event, the undercover officer had an independent source for identifying the defendant (see, People v Rowan, 199 AD2d 546 ; People v Brown, 191 AD2d 502 ).
We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Johnson 173 AD2d 734 p. 348
- People v. Waring 183 AD2d 271 p. 348
- People v. Brown 191 AD2d 502 p. 348