Hyperlawhypertext legal database Rupert v. United Precious Metals Refining, Inc. 212 A.D.2d 980

← Cases

Rupert v. United Precious Metals Refining, Inc.

212 A.D.2d 980 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1995-02-03 English

Contents

Majority

p. 980
Gregory M. Rupert et al., Appellants-Respondents, v United Precious Metals Refining, Inc., Respondent-Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent. John R. Rupert, Doing Business as Exel Electric Company, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents; James L. Shotwell, Doing Business as James L. Shotwell Plumbing Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
[624 NYS2d 999]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Cosgrove, J. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cosgrove, J.—Labor Law § 240 [1].) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley and Davis, JJ.

Statutes and regulations cited