Haberstro v. Scholl

213 A.D.2d 1082 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1995-03-17 Docket Appeal No. 2 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1082

In the Matter of Philip L. Haberstro, Appellant, v Martin T. Scholl et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[625 NYS2d 969]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs (see, Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984 ). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.—Settle Record.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ. (Filed Mar. 8, 1995.)