Majority
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that defendant was denied due process of law as the result of the severance granted to a codefendant during the trial. Defendant waived his challenge to the severance by joining that codefendant’s motion (see, People v Alvarez, 198 AD2d 171 , lv denied 83 NY2d 802 ; People v Aezah, 191 AD2d 312 , 313, lv denied 81 NY2d 1010 ; People v Corley, 162 AD2d 1020 , lv denied 76 NY2d 892 ) and by declining County Court’s offer to grant a mistrial (see, People v King, 192 AD2d 556 , lv denied 81 NY2d 1075 ). Moreover, the contention that defendant was denied his right to be tried by a jury of his own choosing because he was compelled to share his peremptory challenges with the codefendants is not preserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hilton, 187 AD2d 608 , lv denied 81 NY2d 887 ), and we decline to address that issue as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]).
The court properly denied defendant’s motion to preclude the identification testimony of a prosecution witness based upon the People’s failure timely to provide a CPL 710.30 notice. The record supports the court’s finding that the identi
Cases cited
- People v. Alvarez 198 AD2d 171 p. 987
- People v. Aezah 191 AD2d 312 at 313 p. 987
- People v. King 192 AD2d 556 p. 987
- People v. Hilton 187 AD2d 608 p. 987
- People v. Rodriguez 79 NY2d 445 p. 988